
Table 1 highlights the importance of owner-oversight as a way of managing the tension between the differences in objectives:ġ. Table 1 below illustrates how owners and contractors are likely to be motivated by different project objectives. This fact leads to differences in incentives, risk management, and decision-making behavior. When a project fails, the project owner bears some of the responsibility and, by distinction, the measures of a project's success or failure from an owner's perspective are not the same as those contracted to perform it.

It is owners, shareholders, or their agents overseeing projects performed on their behalf by a contractor. To learn more about owner oversight of capital projects go to. Feedback is a gift, so I welcome any feedback readers may have. I can count on one hand the times I’ve been a "project manager." However, I’ve been a project oversight manager for too many projects to count. That means overseeing chartered (outsourced) capital projects led by project teams working for a general contractor. In this capacity, I’ve overseen projects as the owner’s agent for construction, fabrication of major components, shipping of high value items, overhaul of nuclear power plants, decommissioning, dismantlement, and outsourced maintenance and operations. From this vantage point, I see project oversight as a separate discipline from project management and thought I would write about it.

First, perhaps some context. I don’t really consider myself a project manager in the PMBOK® framing of it.
